Petitioners-employees filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against respondent PAL who dismissed them after they were allegedly caught in the act of sniffing shabu within its premises. The Labor Arbiter ruled for the petitioners and ordered immediately for their reinstatement. Prior to this decision, SEC had placed PAL under an Interim Rehabilitation Receiver, and subsequently under a Permanent Rehabilitation Receiver. PAL appealed and the Labor Tribunal ruled in their favor. Subsequently, the Labor Arbiter issued a writ of execution for the reinstatement and issued a notice of garnishment. The Labor Tribunal affirmed the writ and notice but suspended and referred the action to the Rehabilitation Receiver of PAL. On appeal, CA found for respondent PAL.
Whether or not PAL being under corporate rehabilitation suspends any monetary claims to it.
It is settled that upon appointment by the SEC of a rehabilitation receiver, all actions for claims before any court, tribunal or board against the corporation shall ipso jure be suspended. As stated early on, during the pendency of petitioners’ complaint before the Labor Arbiter, the SEC placed respondent under an Interim Rehabilitation Receiver. After the Labor Arbiter rendered his decision, the SEC replaced the Interim Rehabilitation Receiver with a Permanent Rehabilitation Receiver.
While reinstatement pending appeal aims to avert the continuing threat or danger to the survival or even the life of the dismissed employee and his family, it does not contemplate the period when the employer-corporation itself is similarly in a judicially monitored state of being resuscitated in order to survive.